Halal Meat Blog

@Trent25346 ‘normal” would be in accordance with the law that there should be no undue suffering, the death should be as quick as possible, and the animal should be rendered unconscious before hand via high shock electrical stunning. I know its still gruesome when explained. Halal is a religious ritual sacrifice where the animals has to be kept alive as long as possible after having its throat cut, so the heart pumps out the blood, and then the meat is blessed by a Muslim, or a Jew for Kosher.

so whats the difference between halal meat and normal meat?

@farzanatasneem No they are not different and they are certainly not guided by “god”, that is utter bullshit you’re done here, thanks for your input.

@123backinyerface
We are discussing natural instincts that are ingrained in animals.
Humans are different than other animals in their instinct to be driven towards sinning.

Humans are guided by God not to kill innocents

@farzanatasneem “That is to check carnivores from getting multiplied”? So then I guess then by that logic all the Muslims that are dying in Iraq and Afghanistan are just to check the amount of potential terrorists being born into the world then? Or the starvation of men women and children in Africa due to Muslim Militia forcing them into baron regions of land, must be to limit the amount of black people being born into the world then too?

@123backinyerface

That is to check the carnivores from getting multiplied many times so as not to be a threat for survival for the animals whose meat they eat up.

Yes it is God’s plan !

@123backinyerface
God created animals to be eaten by man and allowed us to use them while we give them their rights of getting good care from us.
Those animals which are allowed to be eaten are domestic animals which will get eaten by carnivores if left alone in jungle , will carnivores give them anaesthetic injections before they bite into them for killing?

So if humans give them safe shelter, they have right to kill them for food when they need their meat.

Also your videos use emotional ploys and mask this as being inherent from god, yet you support the slaughter and eating of animals with zero emotion. Do you think animals went through millions of years evolution and protected their young for you to eat them?

@farzanatasneem We are not discussing ‘atheism’ here either. But of course science gives a basis to atheism, your deity is not detectable through science therefore the belief in it is negated.

This is a learned trait, there are even animals that capitalize on the maternal nature of other animals. Male Lions and Hippos will kill all the young when they establish leadership, is that god too then? You don’t even understand the term “survival of the fittest”.

@123backinyerface
You only read the title of my video and did not watch it.
It shows how a mother gives away her life for her offspring to survive.
How few animals of another species save life of another animal species offsprings when they find them in danger.
Love for another species defies struggle for survival.
Why will an animal of one species give support to another species baby ?

You did not watch that video !

@123backinyerface
We are not discussing evolution here.

Evolution by natural selection is a fact when it is talked in scientific circles and it states how any living thing has a capability to survive in changing environment.
It does not have any relation with Atheism nor it gives any scientific basis to Atheism.

“Many a gynaecologists remove uterus /ovaries of patients daily.

Does that make them immoral??”

You seriously need an answer to that? Well ok if they hold down a patient and remove them without their consent then yes that would make them immoral, however they don’t do they? Once again deflecting to an argument that is both irrelevant and in error.

You’re not raising issues, you’re only make excuses.

@farzanatasneem Well I was spot on then wasn’t I? You are indeed a creationist. Your video “Mother’s self sacrifice in nature destroys Darwinism” was just laughable. There is not a single piece of evidence on this blue dot that has “destroyed” Darwin’s theory of evolution and in all seriousness if you come back with “its just a theory not a fact” it will be the last post you make here because I have no time to walk a creationist through evolution.

@123backinyerface

Many a gynaecologists remove uterus /ovaries of patients daily.
Does that make them immoral??

Much propagandas have been made against Sharia rules.
Visit my channel to watch my uploads, most are a reply to some issues raised against Islam.

/watch?v=2VWRWxpnVMg

This video describes stoning laws.
Did you watch the above videos?

@farzanatasneem No, you are wrong, morality does not come from religion, never did and never will. Its not moral to cut the hands and feet from a human being for a material crime, its not moral to kill your children for disrespect, its not moral to stone someone to death for having sex with a consenting adult, and its not moral to have sex with a non consenting minor, that’s the morality religion brings to the table. If you think “morality” started with religion, then you must be a creationist.

@123backinyerface
Religion sets the standard of morality.
Irreligious can go to any level when they are empowered as they have no God conscience.

/watch?v=dj6hyTgNMDw

/watch?v=HBkAZbMwsWI&feature=channel_video_title

@123backinyerface
As I told you I do not believe that stunning gives lesser pain to any animal than sharply cutting it with knife.

And skinning is not allowed before an animal dies off completely.
What is important is that Muslims should take care of animals with sincere care.

@farzanatasneem Yeah that’s UK law though, how is it done within an Islamic State, with or without stunning?

@123backinyerface Watch your video again that has been uploaded by you.
Can’t you see the man sharpens his knife before cutting animals’ neck?

This is command of the Prophet to kill animal in one sharp cut so as not to make him die twice and not to give him pain twice.

If UK laws ask Muslims to stun the animal before cutting them to make Halal, Islam permits it but in my opinion that is still better than start skinning an animal only after stunning as stunning gives varied loss of conscience

And please do not start with the “morality” of religion because I am not about to take that level of horseshit from anyone.

@farzanatasneem Oh wow, a Muslim that deflects to what the Chinese do, how original, wow you must be a trendsetter with that tactic. Now explain to me how the brutality of the Chinese eating dogs n cats is a religious act, or an act specifically due to NOT believing in a fictitious desert deity?

Are all animals used for Muslim consumption “stunned” first, because what you term as a “bias” video is evidence they aren’t. btw how would you get a stunned cow into that machine?

@JulianThePhilosopher Exactly! my friend, its a damn shame we have to mirror any video at all. But the more they push the more we will push back.

In! b4 the you tube “thought crime police” aka neo liberals accuse u of being racist.